| 
Citations
 | 
   web
Foster, T. M., Temple, W., Cameron, B., & Poling, A. (1997). Demand curves for food in hens: Similarity under fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules. Behav. Process., 39(2), 177–185.
toggle visibility
Gifford, A. K., Cloutier, S., & Newberry, R. C. (2007). Objects as enrichment: Effects of object exposure time and delay interval on object recognition memory of the domestic pig. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107(3-4), 206–217.
toggle visibility
Vieuille, C., Berger, F., Le Pape, G., & Bellanger, D. (2003). Sow behaviour involved in the crushing of piglets in outdoor farrowing huts--a brief report. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 80(2), 109–115.
toggle visibility
Henderson, J. V., & Warant, N. K. (2001). Reducing Equine Stereotypies Using an Equiball. Anim Welfare, 10(1), 73–80.
toggle visibility
Ernst, K., Puppe, B., Schon, P. C., & Manteuffel, G. (2005). A complex automatic feeding system for pigs aimed to induce successful behavioural coping by cognitive adaptation. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 91(3-4), 205–218.
toggle visibility
Stomp, M., d'Ingeo, S., Henry, S., Cousillas, H., & Hausberger, M. (2021). Brain activity reflects (chronic) welfare state: Evidence from individual electroencephalography profiles in an animal model. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 236, 105271.
toggle visibility
Stomp, M., d'Ingeo, S., Henry, S., Cousillas, H., & Hausberger, M. (2021). Brain activity reflects (chronic) welfare state: Evidence from individual electroencephalography profiles in an animal model. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 236, 105271.
toggle visibility
Krueger, K., & Farmer, K. (2011). Laterality in the Horse [Lateralität beim Pferd ]. mup, 4, 160–167.
toggle visibility
Zebisch, A., May, A., Reese, S., & Gehlen, H. (2013). Effect of different head-neck positions on physical and psychological stress parameters in the ridden horse. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 98(5), 901–907.
toggle visibility
Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M. - V., Janczak, A. M., Visser, E. K., et al. (2006). Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 101(3-4), 185–242.
toggle visibility