|
Cooper, J. J. (2007). Equine learning behaviour: Common knowledge and systematic research. Behav. Process., 76, 24–26.
|
|
Ladewig, J. (2007). Clever Hans is still whinnying with us. Behav. Process., 76(1), 20–21.
|
|
Hothersall, B., & Nicol, C. (2007). Equine learning behaviour: accounting for ecological constraints and relationships with humans in experimental design. Behav. Process., 76(1), 45–48.
|
|
Creighton, E. (2007). Equine learning behaviour: Limits of ability and ability limits of trainers. Behav. Process., 76(1), 43–44.
|
|
Goodwin, D. (2007). Equine learning behaviour: What we know, what we don't and future research priorities. Behav. Process., 76, 17–19.
|
|
Linklater, W. L. (2007). Equine learning in a wider context--Opportunities for integrative pluralism. Behav. Process., 76, 53–56.
|
|
Murphy, J., & Arkins, S. (2007). Synthesizing what we know of equine learning behaviour. Behav. Process., 76, 57–60.
|
|
Kraak, S. B. M. (1996). `Copying mate choice': Which phenomena deserve this term? Behav. Process., 36(1), 99–102.
|
|
Le Pendu, Y., Guilhem, C., Briedermann, L., Maublanc, M. - L., & Gerard, J. - F. (2000). Interactions and associations between age and sex classes in mouflon sheep (Ovis gmelini) during winter. Behav. Process., 52(2-3), 97–107.
|
|
Gärdenfors P. (1995). Cued and detached representations in animal cognition. Behav. Process., 35, 263–273.
|
