| 
Citations
 | 
   web
Hausberger, M., & Muller, C. (2002). A brief note on some possible factors involved in the reactions of horses to humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 76(4), 339–344.
toggle visibility
Henry, S., Hemery, D., Richard, M. - A., & Hausberger, M. (2005). Human-mare relationships and behaviour of foals toward humans. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 93(3-4), 341–362.
toggle visibility
Wolff, A., & Hausberger, M. (1996). Learning and memorisation of two different tasks in horses: the effects of age, sex and sire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 46(3-4), 137–143.
toggle visibility
Le Scolan, N., Hausberger, M., & Wolff, A. (1997). Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches. Behav. Process., 41(3), 257–266.
toggle visibility
Hausberger, M., Gautier, E., Muller, C., & Jego, P. (2007). Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 107(3-4), 299–306.
toggle visibility
Hausberger, M., Roche, H., Henry, S., & Visser, E. K. (2008). A review of the human-horse relationship. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109(1), 1–24.
toggle visibility
George, I., Cousillas, H., Richard, J. - P., & Hausberger, M. (2002). Song perception in the European starling: hemispheric specialisation and individual variations. Compt. Rend. Biol., 325(3), 197–204.
toggle visibility
Benhajali, H., Richard-Yris, M. - A., Leroux, M., Ezzaouia, M., Charfi, F., & Hausberger, M. (2008). A note on the time budget and social behaviour of densely housed horses: A case study in Arab breeding mares. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 112(1-2), 196–200.
toggle visibility
Hausberger, M., & Richard-Yris, M. - A. (2005). Individual differences in the domestic horse, origins, development and stability. In D. S. Mills, & McDonnell (Eds.), The domestic horse : the origins, development, and management of its behaviour (pp. 33–52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2005.
toggle visibility
Fureix, C., Jego, P., Sankey, C., & Hausberger, M. (2009). How horses (Equus caballus) see the world: humans as significant “objects”. Anim. Cogn., 12(4), 643–654.
toggle visibility