|
|
Klingel H,. (1980). A Comparison of the Social Organization of the Equids. in Denniston RH (ed).
|
|
|
|
Mccort Wd,. (1980). The behavior and social organization of feral asses on Ossabaw Island, Georgia PhD thesis, Pensylvania State U. Ph.D. thesis, , Pensylvania State U.
|
|
|
|
Keiper, R. R., & Keenan, M. A. (1980). Nocturnal activity patterns of feral horses. J. Mammal, 61, 116–118.
|
|
|
|
Stoddart, D. M. (1980). The ecology of vertebrate olfaction. London; New York: Chapman and Hall.
|
|
|
|
Karstens, H. (1980). Das Military Pferd.
|
|
|
|
Brügger, A. (1980). Die Erkrankungen des Bewegungsapparates und seines Nervensystems. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
|
|
|
|
Brügger, A. (1980). Gesunde Körperhaltung im Alltag. Zürich: Dr. A. Brügger.
|
|
|
|
Beck, B. B. (1980). Animal tool behaviour: The use and manufacture of tools by animals. New York: Garland.
|
|
|
|
Zentall, T. R., Hogan, D. E., Edwards, C. A., & Hearst, E. (1980). Oddity learning in the pigeon as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process, 6(3), 278–299.
Abstract: Pigeons' rate of learning a two-color oddity task increased as a function of the number of incorrect alternatives from 2 to 24 in Experiments 1, 2, and 3. In general, pigeons that were transferred from many-incorrect-alternative to two-incorrect-alternative oddity performed better than controls, but considerably below baseline (Experiments 2 and 3). In Experiment 4, pigeons showed no unconditioned tendency to peck the odd stimulus among 24 incorect alternatives, when pecks were nondifferentially reinforced, and in Experiment 5, when this procedure was preceded by oddity training, a progressive drop in odd-stimulus pecking was found. In Experiment 6, pigeons exposed to a nine-stimulus array in which the odd stimulus appeared (a) in the center or (b) separate from the array learned faster than when the odd stimulus was at the edge. This outcome suggests ththe figure-ground relation between the odd stimulus and the incorrect alternatives plays a role in the facilitation produced by increasing the number of incorrect alternatives but that poor performance on the standard, three-alternative oddity task appears to be due to center-odd trials which provide a difficult size or number discrimination.
|
|
|
|
Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210(4471), 801–803.
Abstract: Vervet monkeys give different alarm calls to different predators. Recordings of the alarms played back when predators were absent caused the monkeys to run into trees for leopard alarms, look up for eagle alarms, and look down for snake alarms. Adults call primarily to leopards, martial eagles, and pythons, but infants give leopard alarms to various mammals, eagle alarms to many birds, and snake alarms to various snakelike objects. Predator classification improves with age and experience.
|
|
