|
|
Dasser V. (1988). Mapping social concepts in monkeys. In Machiavellian Intelligence (pp. 85–93). Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
|
|
|
|
Hayes, K. (1988). Temperament tip-offs. Horse and Rider, 11, 47–84.
|
|
|
|
Jenks, S. M. (1988). Behavioral regulation of social organization and mating in a captive wolf pack. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Conn. Dept. Biobehavioral Sci, .
|
|
|
|
Boyd L. (1988). The behaviour of Przewalski’s horses. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
|
|
|
|
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1988). Do monkeys understand their realtions? In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
|
|
|
Milton, K. (1988). Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence (pp. 285–409). Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
|
|
|
|
Dukas, R. (Ed.). (1988). Cognitive Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
|
|
|
Jerison H. J. (1988). Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology (J. J. Jerison H. J., Ed.).
|
|
|
|
Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1988). Tactical deception in primates. Behav. Brain Sci., 11(02), 233–244.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Tactical deception occurs when an individual is able to use an “honest” act from his normal repertoire in a different context to mislead familiar individuals. Although primates have a reputation for social skill, most primate groups are so intimate that any deception is likely to be subtle and infrequent. Published records are sparse and often anecdotal. We have solicited new records from many primatologists and searched for repeating patterns. This has revealed several different forms of deceptive tactic, which we classify in terms of the function they perform. For each class, we sketch the features of another individual's state of mind that an individual acting with deceptive intent must be able to represent, thus acting as a “natural psychologist.” Our analysis will sharpen attention to apparent taxonomic differences. Before these findings can be generalized, however, behavioral scientists must agree on some fundamental methodological and theoretical questions in the study of the evolution of social cognition.
|
|
|
|
Clutton-Brock, T. H., Green, D., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa, M., & Albon, S. D. (1988). Passing the buck: resource defence, lek breeding and mate choice in fallow deer. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 23, 281–296.
Abstract: lsquoLekrsquo breeding systems, where males defend small, clustered mating territories, are thought to occur where the distribution of females is heavily clumped but males are unable to defend resources used by females. In this paper, we describe a breeding system in fallow deer where males are able to defend resources used by females but the most successful bucks instead defend small territories on a traditional mating ground; where the lek is sited in an area not heavily used by females at other times of year and is visited primarily by females in or close to oestrus; and where mating success on the lek is related to territory position and to male phenotype but not to the resources available on different lek territories. Comparisons with other ungulates suggest that lek breeding species fall into two groups: those where leks are regularly visited by herds of females many of which are not in oestrus and those, like fallow deer, where leks are visited primarily by oestrous females. In the latter species, it is unlikely that females visit the lek for ecological reasons.
|
|
