|
|
Kruska, D. (1988). Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior. In H. J. Jerison, & I. Jerison (Eds.), Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
|
|
|
|
Clutton-Brock, J. (1995). Origins of the dog: domestication and early history. In J. A. Serpell (Ed.), The Domestic Dog: Its Evolution, Behaviour and Interactions with People. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
|
|
|
Van Horik, J., Clayton, N., & Emery, N. (2012). Convergent evolution of cognition in Corvids, Apes and other animals. In J. Vonk, & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Comparative Evolutionary Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
|
|
|
Zeder, M. A. (2011). Pathways to animal domestication. In A. Damania, & P. Gepts (Eds.), Harlan II: Biodiversity in Agriculture: Domestication, Evolution, and Sustainability. Davis: University of California.
|
|
|
|
(2013). R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
|
|
|
|
Petersen, J. L., Mickelson, J. R., Cothran, E. G., Andersson, L. S., Axelsson, J., Bailey, E., et al. (2013). Genetic Diversity in the Modern Horse Illustrated from Genome-Wide SNP Data. Plos One, 8(1), e54997.
Abstract: Horses were domesticated from the Eurasian steppes 5,000-6,000 years ago. Since then, the use of horses for transportation, warfare, and agriculture, as well as selection for desired traits and fitness, has resulted in diverse populations distributed across the world, many of which have become or are in the process of becoming formally organized into closed, breeding populations (breeds). This report describes the use of a genome-wide set of autosomal SNPs and 814 horses from 36 breeds to provide the first detailed description of equine breed diversity. FST calculations, parsimony, and distance analysis demonstrated relationships among the breeds that largely reflect geographic origins and known breed histories. Low levels of population divergence were observed between breeds that are relatively early on in the process of breed development, and between those with high levels of within-breed diversity, whether due to large population size, ongoing outcrossing, or large within-breed phenotypic diversity. Populations with low within-breed diversity included those which have experienced population bottlenecks, have been under intense selective pressure, or are closed populations with long breed histories. These results provide new insights into the relationships among and the diversity within breeds of horses. In addition these results will facilitate future genome-wide association studies and investigations into genomic targets of selection.
|
|
|
|
Pirault, P., Danvy, S., Verrier, E., & Leroy, G. (2013). Genetic Structure and Gene Flows within Horses: A Genealogical Study at the French Population Scale. Plos One, 8(4), e61544.
Abstract: Since horse breeds constitute populations submitted to variable and multiple outcrossing events, we analyzed the genetic structure and gene flows considering horses raised in France. We used genealogical data, with a reference population of 547,620 horses born in France between 2002 and 2011, grouped according to 55 breed origins. On average, individuals had 6.3 equivalent generations known. Considering different population levels, fixation index decreased from an overall species FIT of 1.37%, to an average of -0.07% when considering the 55 origins, showing that most horse breeds constitute populations without genetic structure. We illustrate the complexity of gene flows existing among horse breeds, a few populations being closed to foreign influence, most, however, being submitted to various levels of introgression. In particular, Thoroughbred and Arab breeds are largely used as introgression sources, since those two populations explain together 26% of founder origins within the overall horse population. When compared with molecular data, breeds with a small level of coancestry also showed low genetic distance; the gene pool of the breeds was probably impacted by their reproducer exchanges.
|
|
|
|
Pérez-Barbería, F. J., Shultz, S., & Dunbar, R. I. (2007). Evidence for coevolution of sociality and relative brain size in three orders of mammals. Evolution, 61.
|
|
|
|
Van Schaik, C. P., & Burkart, J. M. (2011). Social learning and evolution: the cultural intelligence hypothesis. Philos Trans R Soc B, 366.
|
|
|
|
Heyes, C. (2012). What's social about social learning? J Comp Psychol, 120.
|
|
