Abstract: Pferdehaltungssysteme mit angrenzenden Ausläufen gelten als eine sehr tiergerechte
Haltungsform, da sie den Tieren eine gewisse Bewegungsmöglichkeit
bieten. Ziel der vorliegenden Untersuchung war es, zu erfassen, ob der angrenzende
Auslauf selbst einen ausreichenden Anreiz zur Bewegung darstellt und wie sich verschiedene
Bewegungs- und Platzangebote auf die Bewegungsaktivität von Pferden
in einer Gruppen-Auslaufhaltung auswirken. Zudem wurde ermittelt, welche Auswirkung
die Bewegungsform bzw. –intensität auf das Wohlbefinden der Tiere hat.
Der Großteil der in Deutschland gehaltenen Pferde verbringt die meiste Zeit des
Tages im Stall, obwohl mittlerweile bekannt ist, dass Pferde unter natürlichen
Haltungsbedingungen 12 bis 16 Stunden des Tages in Bewegung verbringen. Der
Optimierung der Stallhaltungssysteme gilt daher ein besonderes Interesse.
Zu diesem Zweck wurden von September 2004 bis Oktober 2005 Versuche mit 24
Warmblutstuten im Alter von 1½ bis 3½ Jahren in Einzel- und Gruppen-
Auslaufhaltungssystemen durchgeführt. Jeweils sechs Pferde bildeten eine Versuchsgruppe.
In jeder Gruppe fanden fünf Varianten von einer ca. dreiwöchigen
Dauer statt. Die Gruppenhaltung wurde dabei durch drei unterschiedliche Zusatzbewegungsangebote
(2 Std. Weide / Tag, 2 Std. unbegrünte Koppel / Tag, 1 Std. Freilauf-
Führanlage / Tag) ergänzt. In der Einzel-Auslaufhaltung (Box mit 45 m²-großem
angrenzenden Auslauf) und in einer Versuchsvariante der Gruppenhaltung bekamen
die Pferde hingegen keine zusätzliche Bewegung außerhalb des Stallhaltungssystems
angeboten. Das Gruppenhaltungssystem selbst war durch die räumliche
Trennung der Funktionsbereiche (Liegen, Fressen, Trinken, Bewegen) gekennzeichnet
und der angrenzende Auslauf war 270 m² groß. In einer zusätzlichen Versuchsphase
fand in der Gruppenhaltung eine Erweiterung des permanent zugänglichen
Auslaufs auf insg. 540 m² statt.
Die Bewegungsaktivität wurde mit Pedometern erfasst, die an jeweils einem Hinterbein
der Pferde befestigt wurden und ergänzend fand eine Analyse von Videoaufzeichnungen
statt. Zur Beurteilung der Stressbelastung fanden Messungen der Herz192
Zusammenfassung
frequenzvariabilität (Parameter HF und SD2) und der fäkalen Cortisolmetabolitenkonzentration
statt.
Die Auswertung des Bewegungsverhaltens ergab, dass eine zusätzliche zweistündige
freie Bewegung der Pferdegruppe auf einer Weide zu einer deutlichen
Steigerung der durchschnittlichen Bewegungsaktivität (149,6 Min. / Tag) führt,
ebenso wie eine einstündige Bewegung in einer Führanlage (173,0 Min. / Tag). Eine
unbegrünte Koppel regte die Pferde der Gruppenhaltung hingegen nicht zu vermehrter
Bewegung an (131,6 Min. / Tag), sondern bewirkte z. T. sogar eine Abnahme
der Bewegungsaktivität. In der Gruppen-Auslaufhaltung ohne zusätzliches Bewegungsangebot
war die Bewegungsaktivität ebenfalls gering (125,8 Min / Tag) und
während der Einzel-Auslaufhaltung ohne Zusatzbewegung zeigten die Pferde die
geringste Bewegungsaktivität (102,3 Min. / Tag).
Bei der alleinigen Analyse der Bewegungszeit im Stallhaltungssystem war kein signifikanter
Einfluss der zusätzlichen Bewegung außerhalb des Stallsystems auf die
übrige Fortbewegung feststellbar.
Auch eine Vergrößerung des an den Stall angrenzenden Auslaufs im Gruppenhaltungssystem
hatte keinen steigernden Einfluss auf das Bewegungsverhalten der
Pferde.
Die Stressbelastung der Pferde war in den Varianten der Gruppenhaltung mit zweistündigem
Weidegang (SD2: 82,9 ms; Cortisolmetaboliten: 29,0 nmol / kg Kot) sowie
der einstündigen Bewegung in einer Freilauf-Führanlage (SD2: 99,2 ms; Cortisolmetaboliten:
27,7 nmol / kg Kot) am geringsten. Die Untersuchungen zeigten eine
Stresszunahme in der Gruppenhaltung mit zweistündigem Auslauf auf einer unbegrünten
Koppel ohne Futterangebot (SD2: 101,3 ms; Cortisolmetaboliten:
39,6 nmol / kg Kot) sowie in der Variante der Gruppenhaltung ohne zusätzliches Bewegungsangebot
(SD2: 113,3 ms; Cortisolmetaboliten: 38,4 nmol / kg Kot). Dem
Mittelwert der Gruppe nach zu folgern hatten die Pferde während der Einzelhaltung
ohne Zusatzbewegung eine sehr große Stressbelastung (SD2: 123,8 ms; Cortisolmetaboliten:
37,5 nmol / kg Kot). Ein Vergleich der Gruppen- und Einzelhaltung hinsichtlich
der Herzfrequenzvariabilität hat jedoch gezeigt, dass insg. 70 % der Pferde
während der Haltung in einer Gruppe weniger Stress empfinden. Es gab aber auch
Zusammenfassung 193
Pferde (30 %), die in der Einzelhaltung eine abnehmende Stressbelastung zeigten,
wobei hier der Einfluss der Rangordnung eine entscheidende Rolle zu spielen
scheint.
Durch die Auswertung mehrerer Messparameter (sowohl für Stress- als auch für Bewegungsverhalten)
werden gleichgerichtete Tendenzen bei den Versuchsvarianten
deutlich, allerdings ist eine eindeutige Gewichtung der Parameter nicht möglich.
Somit ist die methodische Vorgehensweise dieser Untersuchung sehr positiv und als
notwendig anzusehen, da die Messdaten auch immer gewissen Schwankungen
durch externe Einflüsse unterliegen.
Allgemein ist festzuhalten, dass Auslaufhaltungssysteme zwar eine gewisse
Anregung zur Bewegung bieten, aber mit maximal vier Stunden (insg. 62 – 248 Min.)
Bewegung pro Tag war der tägliche Anteil an Bewegung sehr viel geringer als
beispielsweise bei Pferden in freier Wildbahn oder ganzjähriger Weidehaltung. Somit
deckt ein Auslaufhaltungssystem trotz getrennter Funktionsbereiche und eines
großen Auslaufs nicht den Bewegungsbedarf der Pferde, wenn keine zusätzlichen
Bewegungsanreize und –möglichkeiten angeboten werden.
Eine zusätzliche Bewegung von Pferden ist nicht nur zur Gesunderhaltung des
Bewegungsapparates und der Körperfunktionen notwendig, sondern auch um das
Wohlbefinden und die Ausgeglichenheit der Pferde zu steigern.
[Horse husbandry systems with close-by discharge are considered to be a very livestock-
friendly housing form, as they offer a certain movement opportunity for the
animals. The aim of the present study was to examine how different movement and
space offerings affect the movement activities of horses in a group horse husbandry
with close-by discharge, and whether the discharge provides itself an adequate
incentive for movement. The impact that the form or rather intensity of movement has
on the wellbeing of the animals was also established.
Most of the horses held in Germany spend most of the day in the stable, although it is
meanwhile known that horses under natural housing conditions are 12 to 16 hours of
the day in motion. Therefore the improvement of stable housing systems applies a
special interest.
For this purpose, 24 warmblood mares, aged from 1½ to 3½ years, were studied in
single and group discharge husbandry systems from September 2004 until October
2005. Six horses formed an experimental group. In every group five variants of approximately
three weeks were proceeded. Thereby the group husbandry was supplemented
with three different additional movement opportunities (2 h pasture / day,
2 h non-grassy pasture land / day, 1 h free range horse walker / day). In the single
discharge husbandry (single box with 45 sq. m-large close-by discharge) and in one
experimental variant of the group husbandry got the horses, however, offered no additional
movement outside the husbandry system. The group husbandry system itself
was marked by the spatial division of the functional areas (lying, eating, drinking,
moving) and the close-by discharge measured 270 sq. m. In an additional phase of
the study, and expansion of the permanently accessible close-by discharge to
540 sq. m was found.
The movement activity was documented with pedometers attached respectively to
one hind leg of the horse and a supplementary analysis of video documentation. To
evaluate the stress exposure measurements of heart frequency variability (parameters
HF and SD2) and of the faecal cortisol metabolite concentration were performed.
Summary 195
The interpretation of the movement behaviour showed that additional two hours of
free movement on a pasture led to a significant increase in the average movement
activity (149.6 min / day), as well as one hour movement in a horsewalker did
(173.0 min / day). The non-grassy pasture land, however, didn’t inspire the horses of
the group husbandry to increased movement (131.6 min / day), but sometimes even
caused a decrease in movement activity. In the group discharge husbandry without
additional movement opportunities the movement activity was also low
(125.8 min / day), and during the single discharge husbandry without additional
movement the horses showed the least movement activity (102.3 min / day).
In analysing only the movement time in the stable system was no significant impact
of the additional movement outside the housing system to the rest of locomotion
ascertainable.
As well an expansion of the close-by stable discharge in the group husbandry system
had no increasing influence on the movement behaviour of the horses.
The stress exposure of the horses was least in the variations of group husbandry
with two hours on a pasture (SD2: 82.9 ms; cortisol metabolites: 29.0 nmol / kg faeces)
as well as one hour of movement in a free range horse walker (SD2: 99.2 ms;
cortisol metabolites: 27.7 nmol / kg faeces). The studies showed a rise in stress in
group husbandry with two hours of movement on a non-grassy pasture land without
feeding opportunity (SD2: 101.3 ms; cortisol metabolites: 39.6 nmol / kg faeces) as
well as in the variation of the group husbandry without additional movement offerings
(SD2: 113.3 ms; cortisol metabolites: 38.4 nmol / kg faeces). Judging from the mean
of the group the horses had a very high stress exposure in the variation of the single
husbandry without additional movement offerings (SD2: 123.8 ms; cortisol metabolites:
37.5 nmol / kg faeces). But a comparison of the group and single husbandry in
terms of the heart frequency variability showed that alltogether 70 % of the horses
experienced less stress if hold in a group. However, some horses (30 %) showed
reducing stress in the single husbandry, whereas here the influence of social hierarchy
seems to play a decisive role.
196 Summary
In consequence of the examination of several measuring parameters (both for stressand
for movement behaviour) parallel aligned tendencies become apparent in the
experimental variants, however, is a unique weighting of the parameters not possible.
Thus, the methodological approach of this study is to be regarde as very positive and
necessary, since the data always vary with some fluctuations by external influences.
In general it can be established that discharge husbandry systems offer some incentive
for the horse to move, but with a maximum of four hours (overall 62 – 248 min) of
movement per day, the daily proportion of movement was much less than, for example,
in the case of wild horses or year-round pasture keeping. Thus, if no additional
movement incentives and possibilities are offered, the discharge husbandry system
doesn’t cover the movement needs of the horse despite separate functional areas
and a large outside discharge.
Additional movement is not only necessary to keep the musculoskeletal system and
bodily functions of the horse healthy, but also to ensure the horse’s well being and
mental balance.]

Abstract: Fourteen dogs (7 males and 7 females) were tested for their heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) responses in different activities and environmental challenges while their movement was controlled. First, we wanted to compare the dogs? cardiac responses in different body positions (lying, sitting and standing) and during slow walking to reveal their possible influence on HR and HRV. Second, we tested the HR response during an attentive state when the dog was gazing at its favourite toy while remaining in a steady body position. Finally we investigated the heart activity during separation from the owner. We also analysed the individual differences and the influence of gender on the heart responses. We found that the HR increased during periods of increased activity (walking) and was lowest during lying, while it did not differ between sitting and standing. At the same time no changes in HRV were found in the case of different body positions and walking. In contrast, HRV significantly increased when dogs oriented towards their favourite toy, and we found a distinct individual characteristic HR change in this situation compared to the similar body position without the toy being shown. Interestingly during separation from the owner the HR did not increase, but when a strange person was petting the dog, a significant increasing effect was seen in the HR. However the HRV increased only when the petting was discontinued. In general, large individual variation was found with regard to the HR and HRV, while gender did not influence the cardiac activity of the dogs.These results show that body position affected HR significantly in dogs. Further it seems that HRV could be a good indicator of the dog's attentive state. Thus in future studies both the physical and cognitive factors should be given more attention when HR or HRV is investigated as a dependent variable.

Abstract: Learning to associate sensory cues with threats is critical for minimizing aversive experience. The ecological benefit of associative learning relies on accurate perception of predictive cues, but how aversive learning enhances perceptual acuity of sensory signals, particularly in humans, is unclear. We combined multivariate functional magnetic resonance imaging with olfactory psychophysics to show that initially indistinguishable odor enantiomers (mirror-image molecules) become discriminable after aversive conditioning, paralleling the spatial divergence of ensemble activity patterns in primary olfactory (piriform) cortex. Our findings indicate that aversive learning induces piriform plasticity with corresponding gains in odor enantiomer discrimination, underscoring the capacity of fear conditioning to update perceptual representation of predictive cues, over and above its well-recognized role in the acquisition of conditioned responses. That completely indiscriminable sensations can be transformed into discriminable percepts further accentuates the potency of associative learning to enhance sensory cue perception and support adaptive behavior.

Abstract: The ability to reliably detect what others are attending to seems important for social species to interact with their partners. Domestic horses (Equus caballus) have lived with humans for over five thousand years, hence they might have developed sensitivity to human attention. In the present study, we investigated whether horses would discriminate the situation in which a human experimenter could see them from the situation in which she could not. Specifically, we tested whether horses understand the role of eyes in human attentional states, produce more visual gestures when the experimenter can see their begging behaviors and produce more auditory or tactile gestures when she can not. We used with a slight modification the paradigm that previously yielded support for chimpanzee understanding of human attention (Hostetter et al. 2007). Twelve horses were offered food by the experimenter who showed various attentional states in front of them. We scored frequency of begging behaviors by the horses. In experiment 1, we set three kinds of condition: hand over the eyes, hand over the mouth and away. In the last condition there was only a food in front of horses, which was a control condition. The results showed that horses produced more auditory or tactile begging behaviors when the experimenter“s eyes were not visible than when her eyes were visible, but there was no difference in visual begging behaviors. In experiment 2, we set two kinds of condition: eyes closed and eyes open. The horses also produced more auditory or tactile begging behaviors when the experimenter”s eyes were closed than when they were open. However, there was no difference in visual begging behaviors. These results show that horses discriminate the situation in which humans can see from that in which humans can not. Of special interest, horses increased only auditory or tactile behaviors, not all types of communicative behaviors, when the experimenter could not see their begging behaviors. This result suggests that horses are sensitive to human attentional states. Moreover, horses may do recognize the eyes as an important indicator of whether or not humans will respond to their behavior and they may be able to behave flexibly depending upon human attentional states