Westergaard, G. C. (1999). Structural analysis of tool-use by tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Anim. Cogn., 2(3), 141–145.
Abstract: Using Matsuzawa's hierarchical system of classification, I compared tool-use patterns of tufted capuchins (Cebus apella) to those of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). The results indicated that wild C. apella exhibit fewer and less complex tool-use patterns than do captive C. apella and wild and captive P. troglodytes. Although most patterns of tool-use observed among P. troglodytes occur in captive C. apella, there are some notable exceptions, including tool-use in communicative contexts and the use ¶of three-tool combinations. I conclude that C. apella are unique among monkeys in their demonstrated propensities for higher-order combinatorial behavior and are likely capable of using symbolic combinations, although not at the level of complexity that has been demonstrated in ¶P. troglodytes.
|
|
Doucette, T. A., Ryan, C. L., & Tasker, R. A. (2007). Gender-based changes in cognition and emotionality in a new rat model of epilepsy. Amino Acids, 32, 317–322.
|
|
Bizot J.-C., & Thiebot M.-H. (1996). Impulsivity as a confounding factor in certain animal tests of cognitive function. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 243–250.
|
|
Weed M.R., Taffe M.A., Polis I., Roberts A.C., Robbins T.W., Koob G.F., et al. (1999). Performance norms for a rhesus monkey neuropsychological testing battery: acquisition and long-term performance. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 185–201.
|
|
Quinn P.C., Eimas P.D., & Tarr M.J. (2001). Perceptual Categorization of Cat and Dog Silhouettes by 3- to 4-Month-Old Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 79, 78–94.
|
|
Tavares M.C.H., & Tomaz C. (2002). Working memory in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav. Brain. Res., 131, 131–137.
|
|
Held, S., Mendl, M., Devereux, C., & Byrne, R. W. (2001). Studies in Social Cognition: From Primates to Pigs. Animal Welfare, 10, 209–217.
|
Evans, C. S., & Evans, L. (2007). Representational signalling in birds. Biology Letters, 3(1), 8–11.
Abstract: Some animals give specific calls when they discover food or detect a particular type of predator. Companions respond with food-searching behaviour or by adopting appropriate escape responses. These signals thus seem to denote objects in the environment, but this specific mechanism has only been demonstrated for monkey alarm calls. We manipulated whether fowl (Gallus gallus) had recently found a small quantity of preferred food and then tested for a specific interaction between this event and their subsequent response to playback of food calls. In one treatment, food calls thus potentially provided information about the immediate environment, while in the other the putative message was redundant with individual experience. Food calls evoked substrate searching, but only if the hens had not recently discovered food. An identical manipulation had no effect on responses to an acoustically matched control call. These results show that chicken food calls are representational signals: they stimulate retrieval of information about a class of external events. This is the first such demonstration for any non-primate species. Representational signalling is hence more taxonomically widespread than has previously been thought, suggesting that it may be the product of common social factors, rather than an attribute of a particular phylogenetic lineage.
|
|
Rescorla, R. A., & Holland, P. C. (1982). Behavioral Studies of Associative Learning in Animals. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 265–308.
|
|
Kamil, A. C., & Roitblat, H. L. (1985). The Ecology of Foraging Behavior: Implications for Animal Learning and Memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 36(1), 141–169.
|
