|
Sommer, H., Barz, A., & Lindner, A. (1996). Testing horses for character and temperament. Tierärztl. Umschau, .
|
|
Dixon, J. C. (1996). Pattern discrimination, learning-set and memory in a pony. Proceedings of the Paper Presented at the Midwestern ..?, .
|
Mal, M. E., & McCall, C. A. (1996). The influence of handling during different ages on a halter training test in foals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 5(2), 115–120.
Abstract: Ten foals were used to determine effects of handling during different ages on their ability to perform a halter training test. Early-handled (EH) foals (n = 5) were handled in 10 min sessions 5 d weekly from 24 h after birth until 42 d of age, then were not handled from 43 to 84 d of age. Later-handled (LH) foals (n = 5) were not handled from birth to 42 d of age, then were handled in 10-min sessions 5 d weekly from 43 to 84 d of age. At 85 d of age, each foal was subjected to a 10 min halter training test for 5 consecutive d. The test consisted of an unfamiliar handler placing a halter on each foal and attempting to make the foal walk forward for 20 m. Data recorded during each d of the halter training were duration of initial struggle, number of lunges into the air, time to first forward step, time to five consecutive forward steps, and time to travel 20 m. At the end of the 5 d halter training test, the handler assigned a subjective test rating score to each foal based on ease of training. Split-plot analysis indicated that EH foals took less time (P < 0.05) to take one step forward, five consecutive steps forward, and to travel 20 m than LH foals. One-way ANOVA indicated that EH foals had a lower (more desirable) test ratings than LH foals (P < 0.01). Results indicate that handling throughout the first 42 d of life increased foal performance on this halter training task compared to handling from 43 to 84 d of age. These results may imply the existence of a critical handling period during the first 42 d of age or a phenomenon similar to learned helplessness
|
Brückner, P. D. med. R. (1996). Dein Pferd, sein Auge, seine Sehweise. Basel: Selbstverlag.
Abstract: Inhalt u.a.: Das Pferdeauge, Sehorgan eines Weidegängers. Das Gesichtsfeld. Hornhaut und Pupille. Bewegungen des Augenpaares. Die Zusammenkoppelung der Augen. Sehschärfe. Scharfeinstellung des Auges für die Nähe. Stereopsis (“dreidimensionales” Sehen). Verhalten bei Blindheit mit verbundenen Augen. Augenkrankheiten bei Pferden. Überprüfung der Gesundheit des Pferdeauges.
|
|
Laland, K. N., Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1996). Developing a theory of animal social learning. In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. J. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. (pp. 129–154). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
|
|
Lebelt, D., Schönreiter, S., & Zanella, A. J. (1996). Salivary cortisol in stallions: the relationship with plasma levels, daytime profile and changes in response to semen collection. Pferdeheilkunde, 14(4), 411–414.
|
|
Miller, R. M. (1996). How we can quickly assume the role of horse herd leader: Making horses compliant and willing subjects. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 16(1), 4–7.
|
|
Lefebvre, L., & Giraldeau, L. - A. (1996). Is social learning an adaptive specialisation? In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. Galef B. G..Jr. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The root of culture (pp. 107–128). San Diego: Academic Press.
|
Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy T. J. (1996). What Young Chimpanzees Know about Seeing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abstract: Synopsis
Does a young chimpanzee's gaze subjectively link it to the outside world? Is seeing “about” something to this species? This volume reports the results of fifteen studies conducted with chimpanzees and preschool children. The findings provide little evidence that young chimpanzees understand seeing as a mental event. Even though young chimps spontaneously attend to and follow the visual gaze of others, they simultaneously appear oblivious to the attentional significance of that gaze. This interpretation is consistent with three different possibilities: chimpanzees may experience a delay in psychological development; alternatively, they may possess a different theory of attention, connected subjectively through other behavioral indicators; or the subjective understanding of visual perception may only be present in humans.
|
Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Abstract: Product Description
Empathy has long been a topic of interest to psychologists, but it has been studied in a sometimes bewildering number of ways. In this volume, Mark Davis offers a thorough, evenhanded review of contemporary empathy research, especially work that has been carried out by social and personality psychologists.Davis’ approach is explicitly multidimensional. He draws careful distinctions between situational and dispositional “antecedents” of empathy, cognitive and noncognitive “internal processes,” affective and nonaffective “intrapersonal outcomes,” and the “interpersonal behaviora
l outcomes” that follow. Davis presents a novel organizational model to help classify and interpret previous findings. This book will be of value in advanced undergraduate and graduate courses on altruism, helping, nad moral development.
About the Author
Mark H. Davis is associate professor of psychology at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida.
|
