Jenks, S. M. (1988). Behavioral regulation of social organization and mating in a captive wolf pack. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. Conn. Dept. Biobehavioral Sci, .
|
Boyd L. (1988). The behaviour of Przewalski’s horses. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
|
Seyfarth, R. M., & Cheney, D. L. (1988). Do monkeys understand their realtions? In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
|
Milton, K. (1988). Foraging behaviour and the evolution of primate intelligence. In R. Byrne, & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian Intelligence (pp. 285–409). Oxford: Oxford Univ Press.
|
Dukas, R. (Ed.). (1988). Cognitive Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
Kruska, D. (1988). Mammalian domestication and its effect on brain structure and behavior. In H. J. Jerison, & I. Jerison (Eds.), Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology. New York: Springer-Verlag.
|
O'Brien, P. H. (1988). Feral goat social organization: a review and comparative analysis. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 21.
|
Jerison H. J. (1988). Intelligence and Evolutionary Biology (J. J. Jerison H. J., Ed.).
|
Smuts, M. M. S., & Penzhorn, B. L. (1988). Descriptions of antomical differences between skulls and mandibles of Equus zebra and E. burchelli from southern Africa. South African Journal of Zoology, 23((4)3), 328–336.
|
Whiten, A., & Byrne, R. W. (1988). Tactical deception in primates. Behav. Brain Sci., 11(02), 233–244.
Abstract: ABSTRACT Tactical deception occurs when an individual is able to use an “honest” act from his normal repertoire in a different context to mislead familiar individuals. Although primates have a reputation for social skill, most primate groups are so intimate that any deception is likely to be subtle and infrequent. Published records are sparse and often anecdotal. We have solicited new records from many primatologists and searched for repeating patterns. This has revealed several different forms of deceptive tactic, which we classify in terms of the function they perform. For each class, we sketch the features of another individual's state of mind that an individual acting with deceptive intent must be able to represent, thus acting as a “natural psychologist.” Our analysis will sharpen attention to apparent taxonomic differences. Before these findings can be generalized, however, behavioral scientists must agree on some fundamental methodological and theoretical questions in the study of the evolution of social cognition.
|