|
|
Tomasello, M. (1996). Do apes ape? In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: the roots of culture (pp. 319–346). London: Academic Press.
|
|
|
|
Kruska, D. (1996). The effect of domestication on brain size and composition in the mink (Mustela vison). J Zool, 239.
|
|
|
|
Meriggi, A., & Lovari, S. (1996). A Review of Wolf Predation in Southern Europe: Does the Wolf Prefer Wild Prey to Livestock? J. Appl. Ecol, 33, 1561–1571.
Abstract: 1. The recent recovery of the wolf in southern Europe has not yet removed the risk
of local extinction. Wolf populations are fragmented and often comprise fewer than
500 individuals. In North America, northern and eastern Europe, wolves feed maiiily
on wild herbivores. In southern Europe, this canid has apparently adapted to feed
also on fruit, rubbish, livestock, small and medium-size mammals.
2. The main conservation problem lies with predation o n domestic ~ingulates,w liich
leads to extensive killing of wolves. The reintroduction of wild large herbivores has
been advocated as a means of reducing attacks on livestock, but predatiori on the
latter may remain high if domestic ungulates are locally abundant.
3. Our synthesis of 15 studies, published in the last 15 years, on food habits of the
wolf in southern Europe, has shown that ungulates have been the main diet component
overall. A significant inverse correlation was found between the occurrence (%) of
wild and domestic ungulates in the diet. The presence of relatively few wild ungulate
species was necessary to reduce predation on livestock.
4. Selection of wild and domestic ungulate prey was influenced mainly by their local
abundance, but also by their accessibility. Feeding dependence on rubbish was local
and rare. In Italy, the consumption of riibbish/fruit and that of ungulates was significantly
negatively correlated. Diet breadth increased as the presence of large prey
in tlie diet decreased.
5. The simultaneous reintroduction of severa1 wild ungulate species is likely to reduce
predation on livestock and may prove to be one of the most effective conservation
measures.
|
|
|
|
Heyes, C., & Galef, B. G. (Eds.). (1996). Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Fragaszy, D., & Visalberghi, E. (1996). Primates “primacy” reconsidered. In C. Heyes, & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: the roots of culture (pp. 65–84). Academic Press, Inc.
|
|
|
|
Lefebvre, L., & Giraldeau, L. - A. (1996). Is social learning an adaptive specialisation? In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. Galef B. G..Jr. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The root of culture (pp. 107–128). San Diego: Academic Press.
|
|
|
|
Kroodsma, D. E., & Miller, E. H. (Eds.). (1996). Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
|
|
|
|
Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Abstract: Product Description
Empathy has long been a topic of interest to psychologists, but it has been studied in a sometimes bewildering number of ways. In this volume, Mark Davis offers a thorough, evenhanded review of contemporary empathy research, especially work that has been carried out by social and personality psychologists.Davis’ approach is explicitly multidimensional. He draws careful distinctions between situational and dispositional “antecedents” of empathy, cognitive and noncognitive “internal processes,” affective and nonaffective “intrapersonal outcomes,” and the “interpersonal behaviora
l outcomes” that follow. Davis presents a novel organizational model to help classify and interpret previous findings. This book will be of value in advanced undergraduate and graduate courses on altruism, helping, nad moral development.
About the Author
Mark H. Davis is associate professor of psychology at Eckerd College in St. Petersburg, Florida.
|
|
|
|
Povinelli, D. J., & Eddy T. J. (1996). What Young Chimpanzees Know about Seeing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abstract: Synopsis
Does a young chimpanzee's gaze subjectively link it to the outside world? Is seeing “about” something to this species? This volume reports the results of fifteen studies conducted with chimpanzees and preschool children. The findings provide little evidence that young chimpanzees understand seeing as a mental event. Even though young chimps spontaneously attend to and follow the visual gaze of others, they simultaneously appear oblivious to the attentional significance of that gaze. This interpretation is consistent with three different possibilities: chimpanzees may experience a delay in psychological development; alternatively, they may possess a different theory of attention, connected subjectively through other behavioral indicators; or the subjective understanding of visual perception may only be present in humans.
|
|
|
|
Brückner, P. D. med. R. (1996). Dein Pferd, sein Auge, seine Sehweise. Basel: Selbstverlag.
Abstract: Inhalt u.a.: Das Pferdeauge, Sehorgan eines Weidegängers. Das Gesichtsfeld. Hornhaut und Pupille. Bewegungen des Augenpaares. Die Zusammenkoppelung der Augen. Sehschärfe. Scharfeinstellung des Auges für die Nähe. Stereopsis (“dreidimensionales” Sehen). Verhalten bei Blindheit mit verbundenen Augen. Augenkrankheiten bei Pferden. Überprüfung der Gesundheit des Pferdeauges.
|
|
