|
|
Allen, C. (2006). Transitive inference in animals: Reasoning or conditioned associations? In S. Hurley, & M. Nudds (Eds.), Rational Animals? (pp. 175–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Abstract: It is widely accepted that many species of nonhuman animals appear to engage in transitive inference,
producing appropriate responses to novel pairings of non-adjacent members of an ordered series
without previous experience of these pairings. Some researchers have taken this capability as
providing direct evidence that these animals reason. Others resist such declarations, favouring instead
explanations in terms of associative conditioning. Associative accounts of transitive inference have
been refined in application to a simple 5-element learning task that is the main paradigm for
laboratory investigations of the phenomenon, but it remains unclear how well those accounts
generalise to more information-rich environments such as social hierarchies which may contain scores
of individuals, and where rapid learning is important. The case of transitive inference is an example of
a more general dispute between proponents of associative accounts and advocates of more cognitive
accounts of animal behaviour. Examination of the specific details of transitive inference suggests
some lessons for the wider debate.
|
|
|
|
de Jong, T. R., & Neumann, I. D. (2018). Oxytocin and Aggression. In R. Hurlemann, & V. Grinevich (Eds.), Behavioral Pharmacology of Neuropeptides: Oxytocin (pp. 175–192). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Abstract: The neuropeptide oxytocin (OT) has a solid reputation as a facilitator of social interactions such as parental and pair bonding, trust, and empathy. The many results supporting a pro-social role of OT have generated the hypothesis that impairments in the endogenous OT system may lead to antisocial behavior, most notably social withdrawal or pathological aggression. If this is indeed the case, administration of exogenous OT could be the “serenic” treatment that psychiatrists have for decades been searching for.
|
|
|
|
Tang, A. C. (2003). A hippocampal theory of cerebral lateralization. In Hugdahl K. and Davidson R.J. (Ed.), The asymmetrical brain (pp. 37–68). Massechusetts: MIT Press.
|
|
|
|
Huebener, E. (Ed.). (2003). Fortschritt des Wissens zu Grundsitz und Schenkelhilfen und die “Entdeckung” der Bewegungen des Pferderückens und des Pferderumpfes.
Abstract: Tabellarische, chronologische übersicht zur Entwicklung des Grundsitzes durch fünf Jahrhunderte, wobei “Grundsitz” als Oberbegriff für verschiedene Formen des wirklich sitzenden “Hoch zu Roß” dient. Fehlentwicklungen (anstatt von Fortschritten, nur in Ausnahmefällen erwähnt)sind fett kursiv als solche gekennzeichnet.
|
|
|
|
Moss, C. J., & Poole, J. H. (1983). Relationships and social structure in African elephants. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Primate social relationships: an integrated approach.. Blackwell Science Ltd.
|
|
|
|
Hinde, R. A. (1983). A conceptural framework. In R. A. Hinde (Ed.), Primate Social Relationships (pp. 1–7). Massechusetts: Sinauer, Sunderland.
|
|
|
|
Á. Miklósi. (1999). The Evolution of Cognition. Anim. Cogn., 2(3), 179–180.
|
|
|
|
Laland, K. N., Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (1996). Developing a theory of animal social learning. In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. J. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: the roots of culture. (pp. 129–154). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
|
|
|
|
Tomasello, M. (1996). Do apes ape? In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. Galef (Eds.), Social learning in animals: the roots of culture (pp. 319–346). London: Academic Press.
|
|
|
|
Lefebvre, L., & Giraldeau, L. - A. (1996). Is social learning an adaptive specialisation? In C. M. Heyes, & B. G. Galef B. G..Jr. (Eds.), Social learning in animals: The root of culture (pp. 107–128). San Diego: Academic Press.
|
|
