|
Pepperberg IM, Garcia SE, Jackson EC, & Marconi S. (1995). Mirror use by African Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus). J. Comp. Psychol., 109, 182.
|
|
Russon AE, & Galdikas BMF. (1995). Constraints on great apes' imitation: model and action selectivity in rehabilitant orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) imitation. J. Comp. Psychol., 109, 5.
|
|
Yamakoshi G, & Sugiyama Y. (1995). Pestle-pounding behavior of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: a newly observed tool-using behavior. Primates, 36, 489.
|
|
Visalberghi E, Fragaszy DM, & Savage-Rumbaugh ES. (1995). Performance in a tool-using task by common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), an orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J. Comp. Psychol., 109, 52.
|
|
Anderson B. (1995). Dendrites and cognition: A negative pilot study in the rat. Intelligence, 20, 291–308.
|
|
Gärdenfors P. (1995). Cued and detached representations in animal cognition. Behav. Process., 35, 263–273.
|
|
Beer C.G. (1995). Trial and error in the evolution of cognition. Behav. Process., 35, 215–224.
|
|
Laughlin N.K., Lasky R.E., Luck M.L., Kluender K.R., & Hecox K.E. (1995). Early lead exposure alters behavioral and electrophysiological indices of auditory processing in the rhesus monkey. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 17, 374.
|
|
Houpt, K. A. (1995). Learning in horses. In The thinking horse. (pp. 12–17). Guelph, Canada: Equine Research Centre.
|
Robinson, T. A., Foster, T. M., Temple, W., & Poling, A. (1995). Performance of domestic hens under progressive-ratio schedules of food delivery. Behav. Process., 34(3), 233–239.
Abstract: Domestic hens were exposed to progressive-ratio 2 and progressive-ratio 10 schedules of food delivery with different initial ratios (2, 10, 20, 30, and 40). Breaking points, defined as the largest ratios completed before responding ceased for 600 consecutive seconds, were recorded under all conditions. In general, breaking points were higher under the PR 10 schedule than under the PR 2 schedule, and the value of the initial ratio did not systematically affect the breaking point. The former finding suggests that relative satiation affected breaking points in the present study, but the latter finding suggests that the primary determinant was the `price' of the reinforcer, defined in terms of the number of responses required to produce it. Breaking points were similar under conditions where initial ratios changed from session to session and under more conventional conditions, where initial ratios remained unchanged over several sessions.
|
