|
Records |
Links |
|
Author |
Flack, J.C.; de Waal, F.B.M.; Krakauer, D.C. |
![find record details (via OpenURL) openurl](img/xref.gif)
|
|
Title |
Social structure, robustness, and policing cost in a cognitively sophisticated species |
Type |
Journal Article |
|
Year |
2005 |
Publication |
The American Naturalist |
Abbreviated Journal |
Am Nat |
|
|
Volume |
165 |
Issue |
5 |
Pages |
E126-139 |
|
|
Keywords |
Animals; *Behavior, Animal; Cognition; Conflict (Psychology); Female; Macaca nemestrina/*physiology; Male; Models, Biological; *Social Behavior |
|
|
Abstract |
Conflict management is one of the primary requirements for social complexity. Of the many forms of conflict management, one of the rarest and most interesting is third-party policing, or intervening impartially to control conflict. Third-party policing should be hard to evolve because policers personally pay a cost for intervening, while the benefits are diffused over the whole group. In this study we investigate the incidence and costs of policing in a primate society. We report quantitative evidence of non-kin policing in the nonhuman primate, the pigtailed macaque. We find that policing is effective at reducing the intensity of or terminating conflict when performed by the most powerful individuals. We define a measure, social power consensus, that predicts effective low-cost interventions by powerful individuals and ineffective, relatively costly interventions by low-power individuals. Finally, we develop a simple probabilistic model to explore whether the degree to which policing can effectively reduce the societal cost of conflict is dependent on variance in the distribution of power. Our data and simple model suggest that third-party policing effectiveness and cost are dependent on power structure and might emerge only in societies with high variance in power. |
|
|
Address ![sorted by Address field, ascending order (up)](img/sort_asc.gif) |
Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501, USA. jflack@santafe.edu |
|
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
|
|
Language |
English |
Summary Language |
|
Original Title |
|
|
|
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
|
ISSN |
1537-5323 |
ISBN |
|
Medium |
|
|
|
Area |
|
Expedition |
|
Conference |
|
|
|
Notes |
PMID:15795848 |
Approved |
no |
|
|
Call Number |
refbase @ user @ |
Serial |
168 |
|
Permanent link to this record |
|
|
|
|
Author |
Gardner, A., West, S. A. |
![find record details (via OpenURL) openurl](img/xref.gif)
|
|
Title |
Cooperation and Punishment, Especially in Humans |
Type |
Journal Article |
|
Year |
2004 |
Publication |
The American Naturalist |
Abbreviated Journal |
Americ. Natur. |
|
|
Volume |
164 |
Issue |
6 |
Pages |
753-764 |
|
|
Keywords |
kin selection, neighbor-modulated fitness, repression of |
|
|
Abstract |
Explaining altruistic cooperation is one of the greatest
challenges faced by sociologists, economists, and evolutionary biologists.
The problem is determining why an individual would carry
out a costly behavior that benefits another. Possible solutions to this
problem include kinship, repeated interactions, and policing. Another
solution that has recently received much attention is the threat
of punishment. However, punishing behavior is often costly for the
punisher, and so it is not immediately clear how costly punishment
could evolve. We use a direct (neighbor-modulated) fitness approach
to analyze when punishment is favored. This methodology reveals
that, contrary to previous suggestions, relatedness between interacting
individuals is not crucial to explaining cooperation through punishment.
In fact, increasing relatedness directly disfavors punishing
behavior. Instead, the crucial factor is a positive correlation between
the punishment strategy of an individual and the cooperation it
receives. This could arise in several ways, such as when facultative
adjustment of behavior leads individuals to cooperate more when
interacting with individuals who are more likely to punish. More
generally, our results provide a clear example of how the fundamental
factor driving the evolution of social traits is a correlation between
social partners and how this can arise for reasons other than genealogical
kinship. |
|
|
Address ![sorted by Address field, ascending order (up)](img/sort_asc.gif) |
University of Edinburgh, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, |
|
|
Corporate Author |
|
Thesis |
|
|
|
Publisher |
|
Place of Publication |
|
Editor |
|
|
|
Language |
|
Summary Language |
|
Original Title |
|
|
|
Series Editor |
|
Series Title |
|
Abbreviated Series Title |
|
|
|
Series Volume |
|
Series Issue |
|
Edition |
|
|
|
ISSN |
|
ISBN |
|
Medium |
|
|
|
Area |
|
Expedition |
|
Conference |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
Approved |
no |
|
|
Call Number |
refbase @ user @ |
Serial |
341 |
|
Permanent link to this record |