|
|
Harlow, H. F. (1950). Learning and satiation of response in intrinsically motivated complex puzzle performance by monkeys. J Comp Physiol Psychol, 43(4), 289–294.
Abstract: Two rhesus monkeys, given 60 two-hour sessions with a six-device mechanical puzzle showed clear evidence of learning, the curve showing ratio of incorrect to correct responses appearing quite comparable to similar curves obtained during externally rewarded situations. When, on the thirteenth day of tests, the subjects were presented with the puzzle 100 times at 6-minute intervals, the number of devices manipulated decreased regularly throughout the day, although there was no significant change in the number of times the problem assembly was attacked.
|
|
|
|
Pimlott, D. H. (1960). The use of tape-recorded wolf howls to locate timber wolves. Toronto: Twenty-second Midwest Wildlife Congress.
|
|
|
|
Schloeth, R. (1961). Das Sozialleben des Camargue-Rindes. Z. Tierpsychol., 18(5), 574–627.
|
|
|
|
Thorpe, W. H. (1963). Learning and Instinct in Animals. London: Methuen.
|
|
|
|
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social Facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.
Abstract: 300 Multiple ChoicesThis is a pdf-only article and there is no markup to show you.full-text.pdf
|
|
|
|
Joslin, P. W. B. (1967). Movements and home sites of timber wolves in Algonquin Park. Am Zool, 7.
|
|
|
|
Klingel H Klingel U,. (1968). Equus quagga: Hautpflegeverhalten.
|
|
|
|
Klingel H Klingel U,. (1968). Equus quagga: Paarungsverhalten.
|
|
|
|
Klingel, H. (1968). Sozial Organisation und Verhaltensweisen von Hartmann- und Bergzebras (Equus zebra hartmannae und E. z. zebra). Z. Tierpsychol., 25, 76–88.
|
|
|
|
John, E. R., Chesler, P., Bartlett, F., & Victor, I. (1968). Observation Learning in Cats. Science, 159(3822), 1489–1491.
Abstract: In two experiments cats acquired a stimulus-controlled approach or avoidance response by observational or conventional shaping procedures. Observer cats acquired the avoidance response (hurdle jumping in response to a buzzer stimulus) significantly faster and made fewer errors than cats that were conventionally trained. Observer cats acquired the approach response (lever pressing for food in response to a light stimulus) with significantly fewer errors than cats that were conventionally trained. In some cases, observer cats committed one or no errors while reaching criterion.
|
|
